Martin

Members
  • Content count

    1,710
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Martin

  • Rank
    Squirt

Recent Profile Visitors

1,788 profile views
  1. Martin

    So the new moon..

    No vampires here.. I was wondering how they'd marry up the new moon with the old game, turns out it won't be part of the old game. ie you won't create a game then be able to travel to the new moon. Instead, they're planning on adding the new moon with terrain 2.0 via the customisation/load/create game wheel, ie a button next to the tutorial. So we'll essentially get access to a single world moon in t2.0 and if you want to fly space ships, you'll need to save/exit and make a new game or load an old save. Else wait for the full release in Dec.
  2. Martin

    game now impossible to do anything

    Yeh the tutorial is kinda broken. Just play the game. Learn as you go, ask us questions if you have any.
  3. Martin

    New updates are... Somewhat concerning.

    It's the full release of the game, with all content in place incl terrain 2.0 However, there's still content to be added after release listed in the road map.
  4. Don't say I didn't warn you. But this is a bad idea. You guys I realise are "in it for the money" we're "in it for the fun". Many of you are still just children to many of us. But I would strongly suggest you test the game with at least a few hundred trusted players rather than just ignore all of our opinions. Because you think you know better. I've seen many games, big companies flop, because of this one specific mistake. This is the kind of mistake that saw Sony Games go into bankruptsy. Everquest went from No1 world wide game to like No 99. Overnight due to this specific mistake. Other software houses didn't even make it out of the door, having spent millions only to discover the game sucked on release due to a small group of developers wanting to hold back on release content. When this EA started, Adam promised us, you wouldn't be like Hello Games and No mans sky type anti hype.. but it seems you suffer from the same disease. Hope it doesn't fail.
  5. Martin

    New updates are... Somewhat concerning.

    I asked a similar stupid question, which turned out to be under the F1 options as well. There are on going issues with the development of the game which I do find confounding, there seems to be little planning in their roadmap nor in their updates. It's almost random what turns up. Take other sites like Ark or Wow or Starwars games, they put a post in a week or so before, letting people know whats in development, that it'll be added soon and explain any changes. SeS just fire stuff in and leave it to the punter to work out what's changed and then maybe a day or so later an update arrives in the forums. When he started the thread, I thought maybe since he'd had the game since dec 17 there'd have some fresh insights in opinion, but, basically it turned out to be the same ole same ole. The game sucks because.. thread. Part of development of games or any software is updating key elements of the game code and engine, when this happens, you have no choice but to start a "new game" because the new code just isn't compatible with the old saved data. Also as a tester, most of us know that when a new build is available, we need to start a new game to test progression start to finish, otherwise serious bugs and glitches can be missed. So the age old complaint of "I hate having to restart my games" is a moot argument. They simply cannot update the game without the issue occurring. They could however, have warned people in advance. So they knew that it would require a new game when it turned up, not been taken by surprise, when they next played.
  6. Martin

    I don't know about this 'scrap' thing.

    Yeh and as I've learned from a few convos on discord, many of the main commentors don't even own the game. Seems ses are more interested in brown nosing than the opinions of their own customers.
  7. There seems to be a pervading opinion that we're expecting to see the "moon" released for pax in the last patch. I haven't seen any specific mention but I don't watch discord 24/7 or send a dozen private msgs to devs to try to improve my apparent community standing. So I honestly don't know what we'll get, tbh.. I'm carefree.. happy with whatever turns up. And willing to wait until release 1.0 for everything that comes out then as well.
  8. Martin

    I don't know about this 'scrap' thing.

    Regarding grind, I honestly think that what many people refer to as "grind" is what they force upon themselves. I remember back in the day playing Everquest, people would "grind" kill order missions, ie kill 20 rabbits, kill 20 lizards etc bring 20 tails for xx rewards. They caused the game to become grindy, by themselves, it wasn't the fault of the game. You often got alot of money from just playing the game, ie exploring and doing the quests once.. and not trying to find short cuts to being a millionaire. It takes work, alot of hard work and hard work is essentially, grind. That's life.. you want the big house, the fancy car, the big boat.. you have to grind for it. Or just live your life (play the game) and you'll probably get all of those things in due time anyway. It's exactly the same in all games.. grind is eye of the beholder stuff.. most people are themselves solely to blame for any perceived grind. (the edit timer on these forums needs to be reviewed.. or removed)
  9. Martin

    I don't know about this 'scrap' thing.

    My replies often reference other posts in similar threads, don't take what I say to heart as I am not very often trying to place blame on anyone, just pulling out past complaint/arguments to try to get my point across, which you seem to have understood clearly anyway.
  10. Martin

    Extenders vs Splitter

    I R smart. I R Explorer, who does get lost. But I survive. (that said a dangly thing ate me, twice) Game is same, but different, but still the same, recipes change, modules change, but still essentially the same game. Nothing is hard or a grind when you plan. I R always planning. Oh and yesterday I used a splitter. To send power to two different bases.
  11. Placed a Large Platform B on ground, opened it, placed 4 boxed solars onto it, opened them all, the 3rd one vanished from sight. I thought initally it had fallen under map/through table. But removing the others shows the table still producing power. Saved game and reloaded and it was fixed. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1542019655 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1542019741 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1542019871
  12. Martin

    I don't know about this 'scrap' thing.

    There is now a good argument to completely remove the "trader" from the game. And just replace it with a recycler. You could even remove the shredder as well. Then have a machine that simply accepts scrap and outputs to several nugget types, like the switch on the trader, you choose with resource you want and depending on the rarity of it, depends how much scrap you need to input into the recycler. Or you could have it output to every type of resource at the same time. With common resources popping to storage more often and rares slowly building over time. You could also just remove the soil extractor as well. Amalgamate that with the recycler and then use either scrap or soil to extract resources. Soil would continue to only offer common resources, scrap for rarer and common. However, the argument that scrap can just be turned into rare materials in bulk simply doesn't exist, unless you had massive amounts of scrap. Or are perhaps recycling specific items, which would normally require the use of specific resources. These threads always seem to lead to the same conclusion. "Game is too hard, I want everything now, give me an instant win button". The purpose of game challenge is to make a game harder, to add grind, but it can also be to add enjoyment to playing. It seems quite clear that what many people see as difficulty and grind is fun and enjoyment for others. There is no reason to balance a game to reduce grind if there's enough people who enjoy it that way it is.
  13. Martin

    Extenders vs Splitter

    I've seen plenty of holes hold water. I'll ignore the insults and assume they're in jest. The argument seems to be about the substance of tethers in a game where they're simplified. Like looking at a storm and demanding just clouds. Then complaining about 3" hailstones. That splash when they hit the ground.
  14. Martin

    Extenders vs Splitter

    Also it could be that terran and other worlds have Oxygen in their atmosphere but not enough for humans, or maybe the astroneers aren't human.. the machines that produce it might be scrubbing it directly from the atmosphere, removing impurities or remixing it. Or whatever it is the astroneers breath. And before you say, but there are O2 tanks.. that could just stand for Oxymoron Tanks.. for those explorers who'd travel thousands of miles just to risk dying on a planet. Sounds like it is, but it probably isn't. oxymoron ˌɒksɪˈmɔːrɒn/ noun noun: oxymoron; plural noun: oxymorons a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction (e.g. faith unfaithful kept him falsely true ).
  15. Martin

    Extenders vs Splitter

    Lol.. 100% chance to argue.. Tethers were used on the 1969 moon landings, the astronaut secured himself to the shuttle for the spacewalk. Obviously you just haven't seen the real video.. Tethers have been in use for a long time, esp on sailing ships, to stop men falling overboard in high seas, ie in storms. also used on the Everest climbs to stop people falling off the mtn. Fire service also use them inside smokefilled rooms, rescuers use them in caves.. climbers use them on cliffs. Even indoors these days. The immaculate production of oxygen is just a simplification of the game. If we had to produce power, in order to make oxygen, the forums would be in a daily uproar. Also, if you don't want to use tethers.. don't make them. Problem solved. What do you want? A menu slider to stop you from doing something you can/can't stop yourself from doing?